Re: Thanks for bringing civility to the debate. Suggestion to arrange uploads,
20th on top
I looked at the pulverizing dust argument, one which I agree is misunderstood.
I have read that at first, most of the dust coming out of the collapsing
towers was probably gypsum dust. The concrete was smashed and crushed and only
gradually pulverized, which is part of why the dust cloud gradually increases
in size during the building's descent. Look at a classic controlled demolition
and the dust clouds start big right off the bat.
BTW I have also already created two playlists so people can watch everything
in sequence, without interruption:
The two playlists for YouTube:
Section 1 Twin Towers (2 hours 9 minutes total) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL92DAE5DE3C22CF4F&feature=viewall
Section 2 Building 7 (1 hour 35 minutes total) http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDD5BD81A636031A5&feature=viewall
I don't know how to make these easier for people to find.
PS I'm corresponding with Kevin Ryan re another WTC dust test.
Re: Thanks for bringing civility to the debate. Suggestion to arrange uploads,
20th on top
Thank you! Yes, the Chandler attack video on YouTube stung. He has said worse
to me personally.
I'll see about arranging the videos. Also, I have hesitation about releasing
my 235 reasons publicly, because they are tied in to the YouTube videos and I
really want people to get the whole context of what I am saying, but since you
asked here they are.
235 Reasons for Natural Collapse and Against Controlled Demolition on 9/11
Section One: The Twin Towers
Part One: What Initiated Collapse of Towers?
Reason #1.) Planes Hitting at 450-550 mph
#2.) Planes steeply banked, max damage
#3.) 282,000-lb Planes
#4.) 60% of columns on crash side destroyed
#5.) Fire Insulation Stripped Off
#6.) Cutoff of Water Sprinklers
7.) Collapse Safety Factor of 3 Reduced
8.) Eccentric Load on Surviving Beams
9.) Structural Damage Throughout Building
#10.) Fast-moving Fires on all four faces in 15 minutes
#11.) Smoke quickly choking occupants on top floors
#12.) 1000 Windows Break out; 12,000 sq ft ventilation
#13.) Explosions Radiating Every Direction
#14.) 90,000 Liters of Jet Fuel
#15.) Fires Radiate to All Four Faces Within 15 Minutes
#16.) Jet Fuel in Elevator Shafts
17.) Thermal limit of steel 750o
18.) Leslie Robertson didn't design WTC for fuel explosion
19.) What We See Outside Is Small Part of Explosion
20.) Jet Fuel Explosions on 77th and 22nd Floor of Lobby from Elevator Shaft
21.) Fatal Fireball in Lobby Due to Elevator Fires
22.) Inward Bowing of Perimeter Columns
23.) Huge Temperature Differentials along Individual Beams
[2750o Steel Melts
20120 Colin Bailey, max fire temperatures
15000 F max temp of hydrocarbon fires?
1800o max temp of WTC fires (NIST)
1400o max temp of WTC fires (Thomas Eagar)
800-1500o jet fuel burns
11000-1200o, steel loses 50% of its integrity
1000o Steel begins to glow red
800-10000 steel girders are routinely bent
750o thermal limit of structural steel
5720 steel loses resistance to distortion (creep strength)
3000 steel will begin to expand in length
140o railroad tracks need expansion protection]
Reason #24.) Bright orange flames in tower: evidence of 1800 degree fires
Reason #25.) Major Fires in multiple floors; smoke rising hundreds of feet up
#26. Lattice of Inward Buckling of Perimeter Columns by 55 Inches
Reason #27: Sagging Steel, Inward Bowing Breaks Connection
#28.) Heavy Bowing 1 Min Before Collapse
#29.) The building with twice the weight above crash site collapsed twice as
#30.) 10:20 a.m.: NYPD aviation-- "the top of the tower might be leaning."
#31.) A minute later, North Tower "is buckling on the southwest corner and
leaning to the south."
#32.) At 10:28 a.m.: "the roof is going to come down very shortly" The North
Tower collapsed seconds later.
Reason #33:) Richard Gage claims that near the end, "The fires were
diminishing severely." But they grew from 3 to 14 floors in less than an hour.
Reason #34 : Hat truss near the top held up core momentarily, then dropped and
dragged antenna down with it
#35. If thermites at the top, then no one could have walked on the debris pile
#36. In classic controlled demolitions, no smoke comes out the top
#37. People on top floors suffered smoke inhalation because hot smoke rises
#38. Smoke and dust had no significant upward velocity
#39. How is "Smoke rises" proof of a CD?
#40. They took the towers down using demolition charges on the roof?
#41. Mild smoke ejection at the top not indicative of explosions
#42. 2x Weight Above crash site fell 2x as fast.
Reason #42: Collapse Onset Bellows Effect: ½ million cubic feet of air/floor
pushes massive influx of oxygen on fires, creating large "ring of fire" around
Reason #43.) NIST: "No building in the United States has ever been subjected
to the massive structural damage and concurrent multi-floor fires that the
towers experienced on Sept. 11."
Reason #44: 13 Story High Façade... Why Didn't Nanothermites Pulverize This?
Part Two: Richard Gage's 10 Reasons for Controlled Demolition etc.
Reason 45: Total Dismemberment of Steel Structures DID NOT HAPPEN see slide
#46. Minimal Damage to Adjacent Structures????? Major damage picture
#47. Dust Clouds Common to Controlled Demolition and Natural Collapse
Reason #48.) By Definition Controlled Demolition Impossible With Variables
Like Plane Crashes and Fires
#49.) Tom Sullivan: Very Hard to Make It Perfect Under Best of Circumstances
#50.) Explosive Sounds In Controlled Demo
#51.) Squibs Appear in Logical Patterns
#52.) Squibs Appear Before Collapse
Reason #53: If lateral ejections from controlled demolition, then ½ mile away
you would hear deafening 140 db sounds
Reason #54: All six companies in the world that can bring down tall buildings
dismiss this theory. They can't tear down the world's tallest buildings in
secret in an entirely new way while a raging fire is going on, tossing in two
crashing 767s to randomize structural damage and make the feat even more
History of tall steel frame buildings destroyed by fire
Reason #55.) There has never been a tall building where a large jet with
98,500 liters of exploding fuel hit at over 500 mph creating massive fires
where softened steel has had to hold up 180,000,000 pounds above it.
Reason #56.) The World Trade Center Towers dispensed with heavy concrete
reinforcement because its weight would have made a 110 story skyscraper
unsound. Instead the builders used a spray on fire retardant.
***#57: Tall Steel Framed Building's Very Fast, Almost Symmetrical, Collapse
into its Own Footprint after coffeemaker fire
Reason #58.) Steel Frame Structures Collapse in Fire:
In 1997 the large Sound Theatre in Pennsylvania
In 1967, the very large steel-framed McCormick Center in Chicago collapsed in
Three four-story-high steel framed buildings at the Kadel Toy Factory in
Singapore collapsed in 1997
The Mumbai High North Oil Platform, constructed of steel and seven stories
high, completely collapsed after burning for two hours
Interstate 580 overpass near San Francisco, supported only by steel beams,
collapsed due to the heat of a gasoline fire after nineteen minutes
Sofa SuperStore Charleston SC, long span roof trusses
WTC 5 had a partial collapse of four floors on 911.
#59.) People Surprised By Steel Building Collapses Since 1900 (Unsinkable
#60.) Traditional bldgs : steel-reinforced concrete. In fires, steel bends and
concrete holds it together.
#62.) Vincent Dunn has "seen twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. Steel
tries to expand at both ends, when it can no longer expand, it sags..."
Reason #63: Barehanded Guys Bending Steel Around a Tree (Sherman's Necktie)
#64.) Robert Berhinig, 1967: "steel frame buildings can collapse as a result
of... fire. This is true for all types of construction materials, not only
#65.) If Steel Can't Be Brought Down By Fire, Why Bother With Concrete
Reinforcement or Fireproofing of Steel Frames?
Part 4: Gravity, Symmetrical vs. Asymmetrical and "Near free fall" collapse
Reason #66.) Towers did not fall at almost free fall speed.
#67.) Towers provided structural resistance and fell at 2/3 free fall:
180,000,000 pounds crashing down at 100+ mph.
#68.) Core with its extra structural supports came down last, standing 25
seconds. The core structure would always get detonated first or the building
collapse won't work right.
Reason #69: Force equals Mass times Acceleration
10,000,000 pounds of force becomes 98,000,000 pounds of force in one second;
196,000,000 pounds of force in two seconds
Reason #70.) F. R. Greening: WTC buildings weighed 580 million pounds: WTC II:
180,000,000 pounds on top going 100mph, overwhelming resistance.
#71.) 7 to 14 times the structural load was on the buildings during the
#72.) In two seconds, free-fall is about 45 miles per hour.
Reason #73 : average strength during collapse a tiny fraction of static
strength "Toughness" = work required to fracture material Much less than the
static strength of each member times its length
#74.) Can Explosives Right this 22o Tilting Top??
Reason #75.) Top of the South Tower is tilted 22 degrees into the hole left
behind by the plane crash.
#76.) Explosives would be destroyed
#77.) Shape Charges Sensitive to Geometry
#78.) Explosives burn, detonate or degrade in high heat.
#79.) Detonators, receivers, wiring, connections between explosives are
#80.) Demolition crews could not instantly right the 180,000,000 pound
building top collapsing at high speeds in mid-course; collapse initiation in a
#81: Lateral Force vs Gravity: Sideways vs Downward Forces
Reason #82.) Fast descent of building: collapsed to ground before time to tip
Reason #83.) Gravity overcame angular momentum and pulled it back.
Reason #84.) The crushed structure resists, reactive force will tend to keep
the upper block centered.
#85.) Towers rotated a few degrees, a gradual collapse mechanism. If all the
supports had failed simultaneously in a controlled demolition, neither Tower
would have rotated.
#86.) The toppling collapse theory requires crushing to be occurring on only
one side, which is implausible.
Part Five: Lateral ejection of heavy objects and Squibs
Reason #88.) Building collapse accelerates, pushing air out faster, causing
greater lateral ejection
Reason #87 Lateral Ejection of Steel Beams Not a Sign of Classic Controlled
Demolition... Very Little Lateral Ejection at First, Increases With
Reason #89: Hurricane Andrew: Impaled Plywood with winds ¼ the speed of wind
from Towers' collapses
Reason #90 : ½ million cubic feet of air per floor at 12 floors per second
Reason #91 : Bow-and-arrow effect when inward-bowing columns snap back and
shoot "arrows" of steel
Reason #92 : "Pinball" effect when steel falling outside vertically hits
another object and deflects horizontally
Reason #93: Loud Explosions can't be Masked
Reason #93a for Natural Collapse: Random Squibs
REASON #94.) Squibs happened after collapse began.
REASON #95.) Survivors felt "hurricane wind" in stairwells.
REASON #96.) No structural deformations from squibs.
#97.) Squibs Start Slowly Then Grow As Collapse Nears
Reason #98.) By The Way: A 110-Story Building of 95% Air Would Leave a Debris
Pile of 6 Stories if All Air Removed
Reason #99.) If Squibs Premature Charges, Others Would Not Have Gone Off And
Would Be Found
Pulverizing concrete and Steel
REASON #100.) Almost all physicists insist there was plenty of energy to
thoroughly but gradually pulverize three-to-four-inch layers of concrete.
#101.) Gage says 110,000 kw hrs not enough energy to pulverize concrete, but
it is more than a W-48 nuclear weapon
#102.) 1,000 tons of thermite would blow the tops of the Towers hundreds of
#102a.) Dust cloud could not have expanded thermally 3.4 times of cloud would
have been 1300o
#103.) Most of the Concrete Pulverized: Nanothermites Exploding Every Inch?
#104.) Rescue crews walked on cool rubble immediately. Hot nanothermites would
make that impossible
Reason #105: Not All the Concrete Completely Pulverized. Large expanses of
medium and small size concrete chunks in sandy concrete not fully pulverized
#106: Twenty Pancaked Floors
#107.) Are those pancaked floor layers in the right photo of this Blueprint
for Truth Slide?
#108.) Pyroclastic Clouds Kill Entire Villages
#109.) This Is Not 1100o; Dust a Bit Warm from Fires
#110.) Why didn't nanothermites burn millions of sheets of paper?
#110.) If nanothermites, flying beams would be red or even white hot on the
#111.) If those clean diagonal cuts on debris beams, then why aren't diagonal
cuts visible in the pictures of the flying steel beams?
Part Seven: Eyewitness Accounts of Explosions
#112.) no loud blasting sounds on videos
#113.) No 140 db blasting sounds ½ mile away
#114.) Masking explosive sounds by 8db max
#115.) Nanothermites may be low explosive
#116.) I read 50 firefighters' accounts of explosive sounds around collapse
time, not before: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...s_full_01.html
#117.) Some explosions before from fuel in elevator shafts and in the
basement, crashing freight elevator
#118.) No seismic evidence of major explosions
#119.) White smoke explosions in fires
#120.) Only Ten or so former FDNY firefighters still think bombs were used
(5000 FDNY employees)
#121.) Few firefighters can distinguish sound of bombs from regular fire
explosions; many are getting trained now
#122.) Firefighters say office fire explosions common
#123.) These explode in office fires (partial list)
HVAC equipment including condensors and compressors
CRT type TV's and computer monitors.
Large motors that have an oil reservoir for lube.
Elevator lift motors
hydraulic pistons found in office chair.
UPS battery backups
Tires in vehicles
Steam explosions when water hits a hot fire or molten aluminum
A metal fire, possibly aluminum, as NIST proposed
After the first collapse, firefighters' SCOTT pack bottles
#124.) If FDNY thought there were bombs, they would have ordered evacuation.
#125.) NIST: 72% smelled jet fuel in stairwells.
#126. ) Random Eyewitness Accounts of fireballs, or mere flashes, or ground
shaking with no other effect.
#127.) Philip Morrell: ground shaking caused by freight elevator crash.
Part 8: Molten iron/steel in debris and from side of building
Reason #128.) Molten Debris Came From Plane Crash Site, is Discolored Aluminum
Soup Mixed With Burnt Office Furniture, Paper, Etc.
# 129.) Why molten debris here only? Why asymmetrical?
#130.) WTC Designer Leslie Robertson said he wasn't qualified to talk about
#131.) NASA Satellite Images show only 1400o, not 2800o
#131a.) Abundant Aluminum in Debris to Melt at 1200 degrees
#132) Molten Steel Would Have Destroyed the Claw
#133) Regular Fires Can Last for Months
#134) Thermites Burn Out Fast, Not for Months
#135) Fuel oil from generators seeped down on fire
#136.) V. Palmieri Testified he used USGS Maps, 1400o Max
#137.) Steel Girders from Burning Floors
#138.) If temps 2800o, then thermal expansion of water would have caused water
#139.) Diagonal Cuts in Beams in Debris Caused by Thermitics? No, cut by first
Reason #140.) Pools of Molten Metal Localized, Not Universal
Reason #141.) Debris Pile 10-12 Stories High/Deep
Part Nine: Iron Microspheres and Sulfidized Steel
Reason #142.) Iron mixed with other metals has a lower melting point.
#143.) Fire burns off materials and leaves higher concentration of iron-rich
#144.) "Thousands of cutter charges" a logistical nightmare which would leave
Steel fractures with high rate-of-strain
Copper around cut surfaces and inside steel
Abundant steel schrapnel
#143.) Thermitics would leave tons of formerly melted iron blobs in the debris
pile, not just microspheres.
#144.) In the early 1970s, thousands of very hot welded steel connections were
made during construction; this would be a source of countless iron
Reason #145.) RJ Lee Dust study says iron-rich spheres to be expected in fire
#146: Photo and Spectograph of iron-rich sphere in Tolk fly ash
Part 10 Sulfidized Steel
#146a.) FEMA Appendix C: Corroded Steel, Evidence of Fires Under 1800 Degrees.
#147.) Thermate Surgically Cuts Through Steel Like a Hot Knife Through
Butter?? Picture shows steel corroded in random patterns.
Reason #148.) Sulfidized Steel Melts at Much Lower Temperatures
#149.) Thermate would cut too slowly for precise controlled demolition
#150.) Localized Sulfidized Steel, Not Found Throughout Debris
#151.) Sulfidized steel: all horizontal beams, not support columns; can't
explain a global collapse.
#152.) 911 firefighter Vincent Palmieri: "I understand that there were a few
steel pieces that were corroded by sulfur, but in the massive debris piles I
worked on I never saw a single example of sulfidized steel."
#153.) Intergranular melting is not classic melting; 4500 degree thermites
would obliterate structure of sulfidized steel
#154.) Discoverer Jonathan Barnett's Possible Causes for Sulfidized Steel:
-Construction materials such as gyp wallboard dust
-environmental sources such as acid rain
Never Mentions Thermate!
#155.) CSWDC Waste Company: Gypsum can create sulfur dioxide when burned
Part Eleven: Thermitics in the Dust?
Reason #156.) 2001: nanothermites in development stage
#157.) Nanothermites nonexplosive? heat not gas?
Reason #158: The least energetic dust sample with The highest ignition
temperature (in blue) is plotted against known nanothermite: not a match
#159.) Carbon-based materials burned in air may have caused energy spike, not
#160.) If you found unexploded thermitics then where are the unexploded
Tests Inconclusive Because:
#161.) Burning test should have used argon or nitrogen gas to see if thermites
burn without oxygen.
#162.) Tillotson used PXRD in original nanothermite experiment; Harritt et al
Reason #163.) Gage flashed spectographs of dust vs thermites, they looked
different and he never explained them
#164.) No aluminum oxide in dust sample, which would be residue of exploded
#165.) Not adequately tested for flourine in the dust, which Kevin claims is
used to stablize the silicon.
Reason #166.) Everything found in the dust was in the towers (if not true,
more proof needed):
sulfur in the gypsum
iron in paint and electrical equipment
manganese in steel
flourine in air-conditioning freon
titanium in the planes and buildings
potassium in concrete (bananas in the snack room?... Just kidding!)
Chips claimed to be identical to the chemical composition of the paint, fire
retardant, vermiculite, sReason #167.) EPA's Erik Swartz told the Times Union
1,3-diphenylpropane (1,3-DPP), was present at levels "that dwarfed all
others," produced by plastic of burning computersound-proofing and
Reason #168: The Next Essential Steps Have Not Been Taken
Richard Gage: We need repeatable experiments on the dust."
Complete the discovery with presentation of findings to qualified scientists
Release dust samples to any one of these independent labs for testing: RJ Lee,
EMRTC, MACE, or NJIT's ACN group.
Reason #169: bin Laden said he did it
Part 13: NIST Report on Building 7
Reason #170 for Natural Collapse: At least Six Variations of Natural Collapse
Theory, all with minor variations on the NIST proposed sequence. This is
normal in science, NOT proof of fraud by NIST!!!!!
#171: David Scott, chair of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat
wrote, "the failure was caused by thermal expansion but perhaps the critical
point of time was as the expanded beam returns back to its original position.
This is part of the thermal expansion theory."
Reason #172.) WTC 7 Much bigger fires on south face
Building Seven: Another Raging Fire Picture
#173.) Fire originated on ten floors
#174.) Water Supply Impaired, no firefighting efforts
#175: "It was a huge hole right in the middle of it.")
#176: First Responders Walking Through Cool Debris Pile While Building 7 Fire
Rages: Where's the 4500o Nanothermitic Heat?
#177.) Damage from Tower Collapse
#178" "Meteorite": Unburned Paper!
Reason #179.) The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Director David
Scott: "The Council...sees no credibility whatsoever in the 9/11 `truth
movement' and we believe, with the vast majority of tall building
professionals, that all the failures were a direct or indirect result of the
planes...flown into the two towers. We cannot see any credible scientific
evidence of a controlled demolition on WTC 7 or any of the other WTC
buildings. The Council considers that the `truth movement' is a
#180.) Buildings collapse hours after fires go out.
Part 15: Building 7
Investigating Symmetrical destruction/
path of least resistance
#181.) face twisted towards the end, rotated southwards as it fell, and the
north face developed a visible kink off-centre as the column failures
progressed outwards from the initial point of failure
#182.) Controlled demolitions not necessarily symmetrical anyway
Reason #183.) "Path of least resistance" limited to paths that are actually
Reason #184.) Royal Gorge Colorado: carves through mountain with nearby flat
#184.) If a brick falls on an egg, will it move to the side because that's the
path of least resistance?
#185.) Conservation of momentum and lateral force
#186.) WTC Buildings fell through path of least resistance, often bypassing
columns and the core instead falling into open office space
Reason #187.) Earthquakes Topple Buildings to Sides Only Because of Lateral
Reason #188.) An object can't just float to the side and into midair and drop
#189.) Thomas Eagar: "The building is 95 percent air and can implode onto
itself. A [large] structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction
other than nearly straight down."
#190.) Michael Brown: "...Collapses began were tilted toward the weakened
#191.) WTC 7 Tilting 6 degrees before collapse
#192.) No major explosions immediately prior
#193.) No squibs prior.
#194.) No ejection of dust
#195.) Squat building wider than it was high, greater lateral forces needed
#196.) Perimeter wall folded over entire building, not demolished
#197.) WTC 7 didn't fall in its own footprint: there was extensive damage to
Fiterman Hall and Verizon building.
#198: 16-acre debris
#199.) Vincent Palmieri personally emailed me this picture: "Richard Gage
claimed... the steel columns were conveniently broken into 30-foot pieces...
for easy and quick removal. As a first responder, I can assure you that there
was nothing convenient about the debris pile we encountered in the fall of
#199.) Nanothermite Ignites at 825-985 degrees, would go off in 1400-degree
#200.) No radio receiver could receive signal to detonate after heating to
#201.) All three buildings collapsed asymmetrically and into their weakest
#202.) Smoke pouring out of much of Building 7
Part 16 (WTC Building 7) Eyewitness Accounts; Foreknowledge
Eyewitness Accounts; Foreknowledge
Reason #202 to Doubt the Controlled Demolition Theory: Kevin McPadden's
Reason #203: Michael Hess's Changing Story: No Explosions, Compared to
Reason #202: Barry Jennings's Consistent Testimony Cancels Out Michael Hess's
Reason #203: Peter Hayden: Engineer predicted structural collapse of Building
7 early on
Reason #204: Why on earth would BBC be let in on demolition in advance?
Reason #205: Reuters Reported Collapse Midday due to dust blocking view?
#206: Reporters Also Said Camp David had been hit by a plane!
#207: Forbes Magazine: "A car bomb exploded outside the State Department."
#208: CBS: "As many as eight planes have been hijacked and only four have been
#209: The media make mistakes, and there was nothing unusual or suspicious
about the BBC's error
Reason #210.) Eyewitness Firefighter Building 7: Fire Chief Nigro
Early on the afternoon of September 11th 2001, following the collapse of WTC 1
& 2, I feared a collapse of WTC 7 (as did many on my staff). The collapse of
WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7. WTC 7, was built on a
small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.
Fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack
them. For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the
mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my
responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop
all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was
given, WTC 7 collapsed. Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that
all of them are without merit.
#211: Firefighter Miller Before WTC 7 Collapse
Reason #212.) Deputy Chief Peter Hayden: We saw a bulge in the southwest
corner between floors 10 and
13, and we had put a transit on that, and we were pretty sure she was going to
Reason #213.) Fire Captain Chris Boyle: Butch said forget it, there's
creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped.
Reason #214.) At 5:20, Building 7 finally falls. There's a
stampede over pickaxes and oxygen tanks. They head out toward the crushed fire
"They're looking for their brothers," says an ambulance driver.
Part 17 Secret Preparation for the Biggest Controlled Demolition in History???
No! #215.) Tens of thousands of workers coming and going day and night
No! #216.) Thousands of Nervous 1993 survivors still working there
No! #217.) The tallest demolished building ever took twelve people 24 days
doing nothing but loading in explosives
No! #218.) 369 shaped charges used for similar sized Landmark Tower
No! #219.) Both demolitions were incredibly loud, and serious muffling
No! #220.) Linear Shaped Charges: Smells and sounds of Welders burning thru
#221:) 236 columns like this would need several shaped charges each to provide
the "overkill" of Building 7
No! #222.) Major structural supports next to the most desirable offices on
#223.) Nanothermites painted on could warm steel but not cause lateral
#224.) Remote controls in core: hard time receiving signal
#225.) Creating shape charges is noisy and smelly. Complete control of the
building required for prep
#227.) Implication of Mayor, Fire and Police Chiefs, building owner, BBC,
"phony" man-on-the-street interviewees, several layers of the Federal
#228.) Someone would have gone to WikiLeaks!
#229.) Larry Silverstein talked about "pulling" in relation to Building 7, but
he was talking with firefighters about pulling the crew out of the collapse
zone, not talking to controlled demolition people
#230.) If Larry Silverstein had admitted to bombing his own building, why did
he get billions in insurance money?
#231.) Conservatives Protect Their Own
Part 18: The Best Explanation I Know of for the Freefall Collapse of the North
Wall of Building Seven
Faster-Than-Freefall Collapse of Building 7
2.) Stage One: east penthouse collapsed.
3.) Debris fell inside building
4. ) Debris pile spread out at bottom
5.) (top.) (Kink) columns about to snap.
6.) Perimeter columns buckled, transferring loads
Stage Two of Collapse: Gradual Acceleration Increase to Free-Fall +
7.) An 8-story chunk of floors torqued down
8.) Clinging collapsing beams functioned as levers
9.) Leveraged faster than free-fall drop.
10.) Stage Three: Debris pile slows it down
Reason #232: This explanation!
Reason #233.) Thermates would have created blinding lights everywhere.
Reason #234.) Unburned, collapsed perimeter wall: no sign of destruction of
perimeter by thermate.
#235.) Entire Structural Perimeter Faces Folded Over on Top of Rubble: Not Cut
Apart by 4500o Thermitics