Forum | Description | Comments | Rating |
www.skeptiko-forum.com/threads/9-11-discussion-thread.1443 | Skeptiko Forum - by Alex Tsakris | Good, high consciousness discussion on a variety of topics | A |
LetsRollForums.com | 9/11 Truth Forum by | No censorship. Freedom of speech reigns | A |
LooseChangeForums | Loose Change | Good forum, but bans no planers | A |
Community.US.Mensa.Org/forums | High IQ Society forum (US) | Requires membership in Mensa. Forum is very open with no undue censorship. | A |
Mensa.org/forum | High IQ Society forum (International) | Requires membership in Mensa. Forum is very open with no undue censorship. | A |
groups.yahoo.com/LibertarisnsFor911Truth | Yahoo 9/11 Truth Group | Good open discussion, with no banning | A |
http://www.debate.org/debates/911-was-an-inside-job/8/ | Debate.Org | Good forum, encourages 2 people to go through up to 5 rounds | A |
www.911Blogger.com | One of the most popular 9/11 blog sites | Censors "My Blog"
entries, so your entry may not appear for days, if at all Does not allow discussion of no plane theories (a good idea) |
B |
www.PumpItOut.com | Forum by Jeff Hill | Has interesting information and interviews Some unreasonable banning has been reported | C |
www.Wikipedia.org | Wikipedia | Presently dominated by NEOCT supporters, favored by the Moderators | C |
www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com | Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis | Has good information about North of Citgo approach. But if you don't support the Pentagon Fly Over theory, you will be banned | C |
www.SkepticForum.org | Michael Shermer's Skeptic Society | Moderator Pyrrho is a 9/11 Falser, disgraces the Society, and bans 9/11 Truthers for no reason. Hopefully, Michael will talk to him. | D |
http://forums.randi.org CLOSED | James Randi Educational Foundation forum (JREF) |
Disowned by James Randi and D.J. Grothe and not
allowed to use the Randi name. Had to move to "International Skeptics
Forum" |
F |
http://forums.randi.org | International Skeptics Forum (ISF) |
Continuation of the disowned JREF (above) with the same nonsense, dominated by 9/11 Falsers, heavily favored by the Moderators |
F |
www.911Discussion.com | Began as answer to censorship of 911Blogger | Discontinued site | F |
Rating System
A = Always Allows Alternative Arguments
B = a Bit Biased - allows all But some views
C = Censors contributors
D = Dominated by Dogmatist(s), Doesn't allow fair debate
F = Fraudulent pseudo-skeptic forum or epic Fail
If you know of additional 9/11 related forums,
or disagree with the Rating assigned above,
please let us know at
aneta911@protonmail.com
Join Toastmasters as a way to speak out about 9/11