Trusters of the Official Theory often apply a "Double Standard" when it comes
to evidence and theories about September 11, 2001.
There are Two Stands - an easy one for the Official Conspiracy Trusters, and a
difficult one for 9/11 Truthers.
|
OCT |
RCJT / CD |
| is considered a "given" as fact automatically | is considered to be suspect automatically |
| majority rules | the minority view |
| do not have to produce any evidence | must produce verifiable evidence by 3 independent labs must randomly select independent labs, rather than based on their qualifications and reputation. |
| allowed to hide evidence | any hiding of evidence would be sharply criticized |
| no suspicion | must overcome great suspicion |
| no questioning allowed or required | must answer all questions |
| does not have to jump any hoops | must jump through higher and higher hoops |
| witnesses can disappear without suspicion | suspicious deaths of Barry Jennings, Hunter S. Thompson, Danny Jowenko, etc. |
| does not have to publish any peer reviewed papers it is ok if it is a Government sponsored report |
must have peer reviewed papers in several recognized scientific journals before being considered. |
There is nothing wrong with being strict.
It is great. You have high standards, and well you should.
The more strict the requirements, the more reliable the knowledge
But you should apply your strictness to BOTH sides EQUALLY
| Dogmatists | Scientists |
| closed minded | open minded |
| don't do experiments | do experiments |
| oppose new studies | welcome new studies |
| don't read new info | read papers |
| lame excuses | no excuses |
| do not get physics | understand physics |
| majority rules | know truth can be known by a minority |
| cite unread papers | read whatever papers they cite |
| include no links | include links to verifiable references |
| think they know it all | humble and know there is much unknown |