Never investigated by Bush's 9/11 Commission
Ace Elevator Company working in the shafts from 1994 - 2001 perfect place to plant explosives
LVY Systems removing asbestos above ceiling panels perfect place to plant explosives
Securacom the security guard company supervising the workers		Electricity and monitors shut down the weekend before 9/11	Board of Directors: Marvin Bush George's brother
Boeing's patented technology: Remote Control Take Over Looks just like a hijacking
Ground Crew for the four jets possibly installing equipment for Remote Control Take Over

Demand a new investigation of 9/11

Pilots Locked Cockpit Doors for Decades

MOVED TO NEW PAGE

What happened to the Passengers - if they were not knocked out?

This theory proposes the passengers were gassed.  But here is a page the deals with this possibility from a prior version of this theory.

Where there really Hijackers?  Yes

The hijackers were indeed hijackers.  Their intent was just to hijack the planes,  land them at an airport, then make some demands, holding the passengers as hostages.  Demands could have been millions of dollars, the closing of military bases in Saudi Arabia (most the alleged hijackers were Arabian), or some such benefit.

The hijackers were duped by the perpetrators.  They were deceived and double-crossed.  They could have been knocked out with the same gas that made the crew and passengers unconscious.  The hijackers were killed in the crash along with everyone on board.

Naturally, the hijackers would have wanted to make some demands, and actually get something for their time, money, and efforts.  They did not intend to die, according to this theory.  What good does dying do them?  People don't kill themselves for no reason.  What good does killing a lot of innocent people do?  Why give the Muslims a bad name?   Cui bono? 

There has to be a motive, for someone to go on such a mission to kill themselves.  Even if terrorizing America gives them a thrill, they would not get to see it.  The idea of hijacking a plane and killing one's self goes against basic human instinct.  It is a preposterous notion that demands a lot of evidence.  But the American public believed such a bizarre story.  Not even "devout Muslim" and lap dancer lover Muhammed Atta would kill himself for no benefit.

What if even one of the 19 hijackers got "cold feet" and thought twice and refused to go on board.  Even one could foil the mission in flight.  If he was the pilot he could steer away as the building approached.  Or a hijacker could join with the passengers, say "I don't really want to die" and overthrow the hijackers. 

In this scenario, the mobile phone calls could have been real. Also, some faked calls could have been added though voice morphing technology, to be sure that specific stories out to the press, such as the presence of box cutters.  The hijackers may well have had box cutters, as described.

What about Atta's will, found in his suit case, that "just so happened" to have missed the connection through Boston airport?  Why would he take a will on a plane if he thought it would crash?  The will could have been planted.  Did other hijackers leave a last will and testament?  Many people write wills, just in case, who have no intent to hijack a plane. Why didn't the hijackers call their parents to say good bye before 9/11?

It is a much easier to find guys to hijack a plane and live, than to hijack a plane and die. That's why they could get 19, plus more, to volunteer.  If Al Queda was recruiting hijackers for the mission, it would be much easier to get volunteers by offering $1 million each for a standard hijacking.  It does no one any good to accept $1 million to kill themselves, because they would no longer be around to receive the payment, nor enjoy it. 

The organizing perpetrators knew that they would never have to pay the hijackers, because they would be gassed in the plane and killed in the crash.  So the perpetrators could even offer the hijackers $1 billion each.

Why did some hijackers only want to learn how to take fly and not to land?  They had every intention of landing.  They would depend on the Auto Pilot to land the planes.  "No one thought of using planes to crash into buildings" said Condoleeza Rice and George Bush. Neither did the hijackers, in this scenario.  Only the true perpetrators thought of this.

It is possible that some, or all of the hijackers were actually covert agents, who had been recruited to help catch a hijacking ring.   After the hijacking, they each planned to cooperate in convicting the other hijackers, confident that they would not themselves be prosecuted.  In reality, they were all scheduled to be sanctioned by the clever perpetrators who organized 9/11.

Each group of hijackers did not know about the other 3

In this scenario, each group did not know about the other 3 groups.  They may have been told there will be some other remote controlled drones involved, in case they were to get word that planes were flying in to buildings. They considered themselves the only plane with live people on board.  They did not envision that they would be gassed and killed as well. 

What about Flight 93?  By the time the first 3 planes crashed into the WTCs and Pentagon, news of this was getting to the people on Flight 93 via mobile phone calls  The passengers, crew, and hijackers got word that the hijacked planes were crashing in to buildings.  This was bad news for everyone on board, including the hijackers.  None of them wanted to die.  The hijackers probably realized they had been double-crossed and sacrificed. 

Perhaps the gas mechanism failed to knock them out.  Perhaps someone broke a window let good air in, causing depressurization.  Or perhaps the hijackers struggled to gain control of the airplane against the Auto Pilot.  Either way, they could not be allowed to live and talk.  They had to be shot down in Shanksville, or the Auto Pilot turned the plane's nose down by remote control.

In such an operation there were multiple contingency plans.  Flight 93 may have been the "backup" plane for Flight 77 in hitting the Pentagon.   The perpetrators, being Americans, had no real intent to hit the White House or the Capitol.  The Pentagon was the only building in the Washington DC area that had pre-planted explosives.  So, when Flight 77 succeeded, the radio signal was given to the explosives in the baggage section of Flight 93 to detonate, as it would have just before impacting the Pentagon, so it crashed in Shanksville.

It is also possible that Flight 93 was planned to be the 1 failure of the hijackers, and the 1 victory, to show that America was not totally vulnerable.  It could also have been a "backup" for Flight 77, in case it missed the Pentagon.  Or in case Flight 77 did not take off, as happened with Flight 43.  In this carefully laid plan, there were multiple contingency plans.  Without knowing any details of flight 93's crash, Dick Cheney said "I think an act of heroism just took place."1  Cheney had no way of knowing what had happened on board.  This was part of a carefully pre-planned script, for every contingency.

Who were the hijackers really?  Some of the people have turned up alive, so there was Identify Theft.  One of the men lost his passport.  So we may never know who they really were unless we have a thorough investigation.   The 19 hijackers may have been covert assets, possibly of the CIA, who "knew too much" about something, or had outlived their usefulness.  Sending them on a hijacking mission was a "convenient" way to get rid of them, and they were sanctioned for elimination.

Does this mean the RCoCAPOV&FMSIPCEHBCE Theory is the way 9/11 happened?

No, of course not.  No one can go back in time to see.  This theory simply provides an alternative, and more plausible, explanation than the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) and others.

Isn't this theory contradicted by 911Review?

OLD TEXT

Remote controlled plastic explosives blew 6 to 8 windows, balanced on each side of the fuselage.  This caused a rush of air to be released from the fuselage, the main body of the plane.  This froze, asphyxiated and incapacitated the crew, passengers, and hijackers into unconsciousness.*  Additionally, oxygen masks could have been disabled by covert agents on the ground crew.  Even if they were available, in cases of extreme and rapid cabin depressurization, the oxygen masks are ineffective, especially above 10000 feet.  Cabin depressurization may have shown up on the Flight Data Recorders (FDR).  So it would be crucial for the perpetrators that the FDRs were "not found" or were "had no useful data" on 9/11.

Possibility # 2: No - Substituted Drone Plane

A problem with Possibility #1 is that the Boeing could not fly so fast, and turn with such G force.  The plane could have been substituted during the time that the radar went out.  Here is a paper about possible Flight 77 Substitution, based on the work of Dr. David Griscom.  He points out that there are hundreds of old plane available at the "plane grave yard" at David-Monthan Air Force Base near Tucson, Arizona.

It would have been more convenient for the perpetrators to have a modified, remote controlled plane.  This would give them months to prepare it with just the right placement of explosives. It could do the high speed maneuvers that were seen, and less resistance to doing the operation.  It would eliminate last minute jitters by the pilot, possibly aborting the crash.

Possibility #3: Yes and No - Flight 77 lands, loads explosives, passengers disembark, then it takes off to the Pentagon

This is a possibility, since there was a time that Flight 77 was too low for radar.  But it is more complex, and requires precise timing.  Sounds like there is a lot of room for error on this option.  But it is a possibility to be considered.

Either way, the plane could have been packed with explosives to go off upon impact

This is the most complete and plausible explanation for 9/11 and the Pentagon. This hypothesis only uses technology that has been demonstrated, and is known to exist on 9/11/2001. Remote Control (RC) of a Boeing 720 jet was demonstrated at NASA on December 1, 1984, doing 10 takeoffs and 13 landings.

A covert Ground Crew equipped Flight 77 with enhanced RC of navigation, communications, Cabin Air Pressure Outflow Valve (CAPOV), and placed bombs the cargo section and wings. After take-off, the pilots suddenly found they could not steer, or call for help. By RC, air flowed out of the CAPOV, so everyone could not breathe, call for help, or concentrate effectively on how to regain control of the jet.

By computerized RC, the plane made a large loop, then flew North of Citgo, instead of the planned southern approach (possibly blown off course), into the Pentagon, Light poles were staged. The passengers included duped “hijackers” – confidential informants going to their next assignment in LA. Voice Morphing (demonstrated at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and reported in the Washington Post on February 1, 1999) and pre-recorded clips (from hijack simulation training exercises) got the Official Story out.

Just prior to impacting the Pentagon (approximately 90 degree angle), bombs went off in the cargo area and wings, fully explaining the smaller-than-expected holes and lack of engine and wing marks (without the need for any fly over). Additional bombs, pre-planted during the Pentagon construction, made the controlled, directional damage (approximately 45 degrees) targeting the Accounting records. After about 30 minutes, allowing some Pentagon staff to escape, additional pre-planted bombs covered the impact area to complicate the scene.

This hypothesis is the most complete explanation of 1) the aircraft, 2) what happened to the people, major testimonies (including 2 police officers) of a plane going towards the Pentagon, 3) internal damage and smaller than expected hole, 4) external physical evidence and plane parts, and 5) angle of approach

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/gage-concedes-his-entry-into-911-pentagon-quagmire-has-been-divisive/#comment-4264

Remote Control of Aircraft has been publicly demonstrated since
the 1937 National championships in Detroit
Ross Hull and Clinton DeSoto
http://.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio-controlled_aircraft


http://www.modelairplanenews.com/blog/2011/04/04/the-first-days-of-rc/

Boeing aircraft already had Remote Control capabilities on 9/11
that could have been "enhanced" with Pilot Lock Out

"A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides
for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200
from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing."
 

Diagrams: Boeing patents anti-terrorism auto-land system for hijacked airlines

www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/12/01/210869/
Diagrams+Boeing+patents+anti-terrorism+auto-land+system+for+hijacked.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-gJGwqBhHI

s
Film stills from TV series "The Lone Gunmen" aired on FOX in March 2001

News.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/boeing-turns-aging-planes-into-drones-for-air-force-target-practice-010653391.html

Remote Control Take Over of Planes

RC planes do not "chicken out" nor miss.  They hit their targets with cold, computerized precision, first time, every time.

	"December 1, 1984. A remote controlled Boeing 720 takes off from Edwards Air Force Base and is crash landed by NASA for fuel research.  Before its destruction, the plane flew a total of 16 hours and 22 minutes, including 10 take-offs, 69 approaches, and 13 landings."   Cl;ick for Remote Controlled Jet sequence From Loose Change video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-gJGwqBhHI Remote Control technology has advanced greatly since 1984, just as computers have advanced since the release of the Apple Macintosh.
	Remote controlled model planes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qNVvRXnWCk
	http://www.911-strike.com/remote_bb.htm A review of Boeing documentation shows that in fact, the 757/767 flight computer has nearly all of the required capabilities as standard equipment, including guidance, communications, GPS navigation, and traffic control functions. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/pf/pf_200back.html Flight Deck  The 757-200 flight deck, designed for two-crewmember operation, pioneered the use of digital electronics and advanced displays. Those offer increased reliability and advanced features compared to older electro-mechanical instruments.  A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing. Linking together digital processors controlling navigation, guidance and engine thrust, the flight management system ensures that the aircraft flies the most efficient route and flight profile for reduced fuel consumption, flight time and crew workload.   The precision of global positioning satellite system (GPS) navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer.   [....] Flight decks of the 757 and 767 are nearly identical and both aircraft have a common type-rating. Pilots qualified to fly one of the aircraft can fly any of the seven 757/767 family members with only minimal additional familiarization.
	Remote Takeover on 9/11: A Critical Analysis By Jay H. an Aviation Maintenance Technician/Avionics Technician for a major US airline.
From: 911 Planes and Remote Control http://www.sianews.com	The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous flight capability, they are the only two Boeing commuter aircraft capable of fully autonomous flight. They can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land, completely without a pilot at the controls.  They are intelligent planes, and have software limits pre set so that pilot error cannot cause passenger injury. Though they are physically capable of high g maneuvers, the software in their flight control systems prevents high g maneuvers from being performed via the cockpit controls. They are limited to approximately 1.5 g's, I repeat, one and one half g's. This is so that a pilot mistake cannot end up breaking grandma's neck.  No matter what the pilot wants, he cannot override this feature.  The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical limits, military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between five and seven g's in its final turn.  The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the WTC.  There is only one way this can happen.  As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a feature that is standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it. The purpose for this is if there is a problem with the pilots, NORAD can fly the planes to safe destinations via remote. Only in this flight mode can those craft exceed their software limits and perform to their actual physical limits because a pre existing emergency situation is assumed if this mode of flight is used.  Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is totally and completely impossible for those planes to have been flown in such a manner from the cockpit. Those are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software knows it.
911Myths does not think it is possible	http://www.911myths.com/html/remote_control.html
Remote_Takeover.pdf	Remote Takeover on 9/11: A Critical Analysis by Apathoid @ earthlink . net, a professional avionics technician for a major US arline, who outlines the difficulties of using a 757 or 767, but concludes "With modern technology, almost anything is possible; certainly "robo-jets" are possible. "
	http://www.ohmyweird.com/2007/07/27/big-remote-control-plane/
	http://www.rcplaneswarehouse.com/nitroplanes.html
	Remote Control of TVs and Garage Doors are common. Remote Control of the COV and FMS is an extension.
	Remote Control Take Over of drones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YjQPPc5VW4

911 Pentagon Theory

RCTO

More on the Alternate Theory - Knock Out Gas

Upon crashing, the gas evaporated into the air, and was not detected.  It is possible that some material from the planes may have microscopic residue of the gas, even after 10 years, and should be tested for that.

Bombs could have been put in bags in the luggage compartment ready to go off on impact. 

Could anyone remote control the valve of a cyanide gas tank in a moving plane, or open a valve to let air escape? 

At least, we know that NASA can control surveying devices as far away as Mars.  So the technology is plausible.

Two Types of Luggage Smuggled into the Cargo Section
of the Planes to be Triggered by Remote Control

The baggage containing the cyanide gas tanks could have also contained explosives, or placed next to bags with explosives, so they were not detected in the wreckage.

What happens do occupants when Cyanide or Nerve gas is released into cabin?

Hydrogen cyanide, under the name Zyklon B, was used as a genocidal agent by the Germans in World War II.  Reports have indicated that during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, hydrogen cyanide gas may have been used along with other chemical agents against the inhabitants of the Kurdish city of Halabja in northern Iraq.

• Rapid breathing
• Restlessness
• Dizziness
• Weakness
• Headache
• Nausea and vomiting
• Rapid heart rate

• Convulsions
• Low blood pressure
• Slow heart rate
• Loss of consciousness
• Lung injury
• Respiratory failure leading to death