911Debate.org911Debate.org
"Encourage
substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of
view."
Dr. Carl Sagan in his
Baloney Detection Kit
The Sage Sagans
Sagan's Debating Tips - Logical
Fallacies to be aware of and avoid
We
support open debate about 9/11
"The way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum
of acceptable opinion,
but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
Noam Chomsky (PhD, MIT Professor)
Note: Richard Gage presented the
Collected Articles On Nine Eleven to Dr. Chomsky
Debate topic: "The complete collapse of the World Trade towers
violates Newton's Laws of Motion."
Requirement: Accredited degree in Physics, Physical Sciences, or Civil Engineering
Prize winner gets the higher of .000911
Bitcoin and 911 Hex coins
Nominations: debate@ANETA.org
9/11 Physics Debates:
1)
2014 -
David Griscom, PhD, Brown
2) 2015 - David
Griscom PhD, Brown
3)
2016 - Crockett Grabbe, PhD,
CalTech
4) 2017 - Steven Jones, PhD,
Vanderbilt
5) 2018 - David Chandler, MS,
CalPolyTech
6) 2019 - Crockett Grabbe, PhD, CalTech
7) 2020 - Denis Rancourt
PhD, Ottawa vs Josh Mitteldorf, PhD, U Penn.
8) 2021 - François
Roby PhD, Heinz Pommer, Joseph Olson PE
9) 2022 - Richard Gage AIA
10) 2023 - Michael Shermer PhD vs James Fetzer PhD
11) 2024 - D.J. Grothe vs. Rick Shaddock
Debate topic: Resolved: the Official Conspiracy Theory of 9/11
violates Newton's Laws of Motion, especially the
complete collapse of the World Trade Center towers.
 D.
J. GrotheRetired President James Randi Foundation Randi.org Member: Skeptics Society Center For Inquiry (CFI) Washington University League of Freethinkers Liberal Arts Douglas is Host of: ForGoodReason.com substack.com/@djgrothe Professional Magician Google Scholar Citations 19 Hirsch Index 2 |
Grothe vs. Shaddock Debate
|
|
|
|
Honorarium, out of respect for D.J. Grothes's time, is donated by the DigitalCoinAssociation.org is .000911 Bitcoin per hour (now about $60/hour)
Result: D.J. Dodged the Debate. Shaddock wins by default
https://djgrothe.substack.com/p/debating-conspiracy-theorists
1. D.J. is concerned that I might not stay on topic, so there is no use to trying to debate.
2. If he debates, then it will bring legitimacy to "fringe theories" so it is best not to hear them.
3. He has about 200000 subscribers and does not want them to question the Official Conspiracy Theory.
 Dr. James FetzerPh.D. Philosophy of Science University of Indiana B.A. Princeton University Professor Emeritus at University of Minnesota USNWR 45, 10000 students Captain, U.S. Marine Corps 911Scholars.org Google Scholar Citations 4202 Hirsch index 34 Wikipedia |
Fetzer vs. Shaddock Debate
|
|
|
|
Official
Story Challenger: Dr. James Fetzer Ph.D. Philosophy of Science University of Indiana B.A. Princeton University Professor Emeritus at University of Minnesota USNWR 45, 10000 students 911Scholars.org Google Scholar Citations 4202 Hirsch index 34 Wikipedia |
Video:
ANETA.org/debate/2023
Asynchronous debate using C-SPAN broadcast
|
For the Official Conspiracy Theory
If there is no debater |
9/11 Physics and Civil
|
For a new 9/11 New Investigation Richard Gage, AIAAmerican Institute of ArchitectsRichardGage911.org
Founder of (and now independent of )
|
|
8th Annual 9/11 Debate
|
|
  Dr. Denis Rancourt Ph.D. and Professor in Physics University of Ottawa (Canada) Hirsch Index = 39 Scholar.Google.ca/citations...1ChsRsQAAAAJ
|
7th
Annual 9/11 Physics Debate
|
  Dr. Josh Mitteldorf Ph.D. in AstroPhysics University of Pennsylvania (Ivy League) Hirsch Index = 17 Scholar.Google.com/citations...NQjA8gIAAAAJ&
|
|
Einstein's birthday |
Dr. Kevin Barrett's
|
April 2, 2019 10:00 - midnight EST. De'ak vs Dr. Fetzer
debate on 9/11
www.revisionmedia.org . Bring your
popcorn Call in: (855) 492-6049
https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/9-11-and-ground-zero/2019/2442520.html
9/11
Physics Debate for 2019
https://www.patreon.com/posts/9-11-physics-for-25514987
audio
Now accepting qualified nominations to debate
Dr. Crockett Grabbe
(PhD, Physics, CalTech)
Author of 13 books including "How the WTC was
Really Demolished"
Anatomy of Mass Murders and
National Swindle of the World Trade Center
Who was ACE Elevator
Company - working in the shafts 1994-2001/9/11
Over 1000 scientific publications from over 40 years of research
Challenger
Requirements: 1) PhD in Physics from an accredited university
2) At least 10 papers published in independent scientific research journals
3) Hirsch Index or i10 Index of at least 10
3) Membership in the American Physical Society or international equivalent
Qualified candidates who want to defend the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911)
please respond with curriculum vitae to Rick Shaddock
Rick@ANETA.org
The winner, decided by vote of the physicists invited from 28 universities and 2
societies
(click graphic on left) will receive .911
Bitcoin
Cash (BCH), around a value of
US$119.
Dr. Grabbe also won in 2016
http://noliesradio.org/archives/111778
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFJvoDRXhE8
http://sealane.org/books/AMMed2/adcopies/adcopy4
March 14 is also Lana Lokteff's birthday
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lana_Lokteff
Redice.TV
9/11
Physics Debate for 2018
Accepting nominations for a challenger to debate Physics and Mathematics
Professor David Chandler, Master of Science, California Polytechnic
University
Coordinator for
ScientistsFor911Truth.org
911SpeakOut.org
more videos by Professor Chandler
Basic physics experiments prove 9/11 was an Inside Job
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QLyum1gxBc
Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the
complete collapse of
the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion
Therefore, we need a new, scientific, official investigation.
Debate challengers must be a Professor of Physics or at least a
Masters degree in Physics from an
accredited university
or Hirsch Index >= 5
Professor
David Chandler wins the 9/11 Physics Debate for 2018
https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.com/2018/03/5thdebate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1dLg_6SlIY
No Lies Radio
Show to
Debate@ANETA.org
Honorarium prize is .00911 Bitcoin sponsored by
the Shaddock Foundation
and Association
for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness
9/11 Physics Debate for 2017
Dr. Steven Jones
PhD, Physics, Vanderbilt, Professor Emeritus, BYU, h=13
Articles published in independent peer reviewed journals questioning 9/11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QLyum1gxBc
Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the
complete collapse of
the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion
Therefore, we need a new, scientific, official investigation.
Accepting challengers with a PhD in Physics and Hirsch >=10
to debate on Dr. Kevin Barrett's No Lies Radio
show. Email to rick@aneta.org
9/11 Physics Debate
for 2016http://noliesradio.org/archives/111778
Now accepting qualified nominations to debate
Dr. Crockett Grabbe
(PhD, Physics, CalTech)
Author of 13 books including "How the WTC was
Really Demolished"
Anatomy of Mass Murders and
National Swindle of the World Trade Center
Who was ACE Elevator
Company - working in the shafts 1994-2001/9/11
Over 1000 scientific publications from over 40 years of research
Challenger
Requirements: 1) PhD in Physics from an accredited university
2) At least 10 papers published in independent scientific research journals
3) Hirsch Index or i10 Index of at least 10
3) Membership in the American Physical Society or international equivalent
Qualified candidates who want to defend the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911)
please respond with curriculum vitae to Rick Shaddock
Rick@ANETA.org
The winner, decided by vote of the physicists invited from 28 universities and 2
societies
(click graphic on left) will receive .911 Bitcoin, up to a value of
US$1000, for charity.
http://sealane.org/books/AMMed2/adcopies/adcopy4
www.physics911.ca - by Professor A. K.
Dewdney
|
Advertising for a challenger for the 9/11 Physics Debate |
Invitations have been emailed with a follow up
phone call to the |
|||
|
Messages have been posted on www.911Mensa.com
www.InternationalSkeptics.com Continued debate discussion: |
 individual email addresses available |
albany.edu arizona.edu asu.edu berkeley.edu brown.edu buffalo.edu caltech.edu carnegiemellon.edu colgate.edu columbia.edu |
cornell.edu
dartmouth.edu harvard.edu hmc.edu hobart.edu iastate.edu ithaca.edu mum.edu umd.edu mit.edu oxford.edu |
upenn.edu
princeton.edu rit.edu stanford.edu ttu.edu villanova.edu wpi.edu yale.edu aps.org dpg-physik.de |
Challenging any PhD in Engineering, PE, or SE to a debate about the collapse of the WTC towers on 9/11
 |
World Trade Center An independent and open scientific
investigation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on 9/11.
Class
photos |
 Professor
Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D.Doctorate in Structural Engineering PE - Professional Engineer SE - Structural Engineer
Chairman |
 |
 |
 |
Interested and qualified PhD, PE or SE please send CV to aneta911@protonmail.com
9/11 Physics Debate
for 2015
9/11 Physics Debate III
|
ANETA is still looking for any PhD in Physics with a Hirsch Index >= 40
It takes qualified physicists to properly evaluate a debate on physics,
Debate will be broadcast on Dr. Kevin Barrett's
No Lies Radio show.
Payment Confirmation Code in
Public Block Chain Debate is sponsored by ANETA |
9/11
Truth Outreach Extends Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s
Debate Challenge to Colleges and Universities
https://www.911truthoutreach.org/557-news-releases/374-debate-challenge-to-colleges-and-universities.html
The Challenge is for $500 and is open to tenured professors in schools of
physical science, architecture or engineering to publicly endorse and explain
NIST's NCSTAR 1A analysis. Tenured professors who would champion the NCSTAR 1A
analysis as technically sound are invited to apply.
The flyer is here:
https://www.911truthoutreach.org/610-afrikaans/download/201_c438eb392bf69355024d80ca3ecd9e9a.html
9/11 Debate between Dr. Alan Sabrosky (USMC) and Brent Bukowsky
www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/09/11/428771/September-11-attacks-14th-anniv-aftermath-US-terror-refugees
Former link:
http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/false-flags/item/412-press-tv-9-11-debate-alan-sabrosky-vs-brent-budowsky
Brent at 10 minute point: "Well, I'm always suspicious of everything in a
situation like this.
I'm always on the look out about everything in this kind of a thing...
I'd like to hear what anyone else thinks actually happened."
Because, believe me, I've read all the conspiracy theories." (Here is a
list.)
|
Mark Ragev https://youtu.be/S10Aotp_tvo?t=1150 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Regev www.timesofisrael.com/prime-ministers-office
|
Kenneth O'Keefe
|
osie's
9/11 Debate on The ViewI do believe it defies Physics for the
World Trade Center Tower 7, Building7, which collapsed in on itself.
It is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being
involved.
World Trade Building 7. WTC 1 and 2 got hit by planes.
Seven, miraculously, for the first time in history steel was melted by fire.
It is physically impossible.
Get a physics expert here from Yale, from Harvard. Pick the school.
It defies reason.
Rosie O'Donnell on
The View
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNl964zavcA
5:00 min.
www.ANETA.org/AE911Truth/petition/summary/universities
|
The winner will be determined
by audience vote Sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Credentialed Professionals Need Only Apply To respond:
DebateChallenge@AE911Truth.org |
|
|
|
Art Olivier September 11, 2014 |
|
|
Arguing the Negative |
Arguing the Affirmative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Howard Stern |
debated JFK, 9/11, and other issues |
Truster & Truther
Popular Mechanics
For the Bush Story of 9/11 September 11, 2006 |
Host: Amy Goodman
|
Loose Change
For a New Investigation of 9/11 |
 Norma Rae"All Theories Welcomed" Facebook group administrator https://facebook.com/goups/911AllTheories Supports No Plane theory |
Rick Shaddock "All Theories Not Welcomed - Except Norma's" Facebook forum https://facebook.com/goups/911AllTheoriesNot Supports simple Remote Control Take Over theory |
|
Hear them debate Friday night 7:00 pm Eastern Time |
|
Kevin Barrett's Debate Challenge Offering a To respond: kbarrett(at)merr(dot)com |
University of Wisconsin |
|
|
|
9/11: What Really Happened?
|
 |
|
Introducing the Debate and |
The 9/11 Physics Debate
|
|
|
BarrettGriscom_2014_03_15.mp3 -
audio |
|
Rev. Chris Mohr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Richard Gage, AIA, San Francisco Bay area architect and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth debates Mark Roberts. July 22, 2008. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlYVUUTeZp0 |
|
Mark Roberts vs. Richard Gage |
James
Fetzer,PhD vs. Mark Roberts |
|
|
|
The official Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911) is a
lie. |
The official Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911) is a lie. |
|
Craig proposes that the plane flew over the Pentagon. |
Flight 77 taken over by Remote Control using Boeing's
patented technology |
| Craig and Aldo Marquis flew from California to the Pentagon area, at their own expense, to make interviews of many eye witnesses, and documented many important facts on CitizenInvestigationTeam.org. Two Pentagon Police officers witnessed the plane passing north of the Citgo gas station, contrary to the official story. Craig interviewed the cab driver whose window was allegedly hit by light poles near the Pentagon, and exposes the fraud. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnboQNTHTYM Part 1
(15 min) www.youtube.com/watch?v=chUECF3paEU Part 2 (15 min) www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sOYFVR3b5Y Full debate (2 hours) |
Ken Doc's 15 Hard Facts $1000
Challenge
"I am offering the FIRST person $1000 if they can fully debunk this list of 9/11
Facts!"
9/11 Commission - the biggest lie in American history
Debating
Tips
Ben Shapiro's 7 techniques to win a debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY5t6iUzajk
How Dr. Jordan Peterson wins an argument
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS5nmy1v34c
Sponsored by the Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness
1629 K Street NW, Suite 319, Washington, DC 20006
Government
Defender invited:
Dr. François Roby - ERD
video about the
Invitations
Others physicists who speak
out and write for 9/11 Truth
Frank of
Fly
Over
Fly
Into